Showing posts with label theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theory. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 December 2019

/// THEORY5 Male gaze

In feminist theory, the male gaze is the act of depicting women and the world, in the visual arts and in literature, from a masculine, heterosexual perspective that presents and represents women as sexual objects for the pleasure of the male viewer.


The idea of male gaze was introduced by a film maker named Laura Mulvey, and was introduce in 1970s, when she wrote an essay on visual pleasure and narrative cinema. She claims that most popular movies are filmed in ways to satisfy masculine scopophilia.

It is linked to the Bechdel test (see earlier blog post), as both are done for the pleasure of male viewers.

Here is a video explaining the male gaze theory in detail.




Friday, 22 November 2019

/// THEORY3 Digitisation, Disruption and Convergence

Digitisation

 The ongoing but advanced process of moving from analogue (eg VHS, 35mm film) to digital production, distribution and exchange, which has reduced costs and led to convergence and disruption

Disruption

 Radical changes to the established methods of distribution, often leading to new competitors arising


Convergence

 The reducing gap between professional and amateur/consumer/prosumer level equipment; the shrinking distinction between audience and producers as old top-down approaches and passive audiences are replaced by active audiences (web 2.0!!!) and a dynamic two-way flow (UGC); the blurring of once clear divides between media industries - film and TV are notable, and think about how both now extend across web and smart devices too, plus VR

E.G

Film4 and the BBC are UK TV channels/producers with limited funds for film production. Where Amazon and Netflix spend billions worldwide, and over $100m just in the UK, the combined TV/film budget of all traditional UK TV channels (and their film wings) is far less than Netflix's UK spend alone. They pay upfront for rights to low budget films like Warp's output. This, combined with non-repayable grants from the likes of the UK Film Council(today that is the BFI) and its regional wings like EM Media and Screen Yorkshire(using government and National Lottery funding), or EU funds. These grants ensure cultural diversity in film production, which would be impossible on raw commercial terms - US movies would simply take up almost all UK screen time otherwise. What box office prospects does She, A Chinese or Tyrannosaur have?!

Warp generally struggle to get UK theatrical distribution for their movies, never mind international (let alone China...). However, you will see Optimem Releasing on several of their movies - a StudioCanal subsidiary that has now been relaunched as StudioCanal UK, forming an unlikely link with WT!

Thursday, 14 November 2019

/// THEORY2 Postmodernism deconstructionism intertextuality and simulacra



POSTMODERNISM

There is no ultimate reality. Argues that all the 'isms', eg capitalism, communism, are now meaningless - the meta-narratives no longer have the power to explain the world or reality. It is of course self-contradictory: postmodernism is an ism!
Strinati argues there is a collapse in the high/popular culture divide - all are now equally valid.


DECONSTRUCTIONISM


The ironic use of existing conventions in a knowing way; the audience is assumed to be in on the irony. E.G: in Scream the Matthew Lillard Character cries out dramatically "I'll be right back", an old horror trope being that this denotes a character will be killed. The other teens at the party respond with that in mind, in a scene where they're sat watching Halloween. Craven is poking fun at the very genre he helped to create with 1972's The Last House on the Left.
This occurs across all media - this Depeche Mode video is a classic example,
deconstructing the band's poor tawdry image and the male gaze.

via GIPHY




INTERTEXTUALITY

A simple but profound concept originating with Kristen - the preferred reading (Stuart Hall) of two texts are linked; the viewer needs knowledge of the earlier text to be able to follow the preferred reading of the newer text. TV shows like The Simpsons are built on this, and there is a strong vein on this running through the slasher genre.
John Carpenter cast the daughter of the 1960 scream queen as his final girl, used to help get publicity.

SIMULACRA

There is no ultimate reality, we live in an endless chain of signifiers. Everything is a signifier of a signifier of a signifier. An example of a simulacra would be 'Scary Movie', it exemplifies the ideas above, taking intertextuality to a new level. 'Scream', had the working title of 'Scary Movie', and this film is a satirical remake, quite literally signposting the conventions (eg Carmen Electra scream queen sees a sign giving the options for either death or safety... and runs up the stairs where the death sign points to, as the dumb scream queens tend to).
These movies have been much analysed, not least for gender representations. Baudrillard might argue that this leads nowhere as there is no ultimate meaning behind an endless sea of signifiers: Scary Movie is an expression of many exisiting ideas or signifiers, which cannot be tracked back to any concrete 'true reality' or meaning.


Monday, 14 October 2019

/// SEMIOTICS3 Semiotics rap

TASK

We had to make a semiotics rap. This is in order to help us remember these terms so we can use them regularly. It's a fun and easier way to remember these different terms.

SEMIOTICS RAP


My verses

Semiotics rap this is the way to go

Lots of different terms a bit like juxtapose

I’m guessing you want to know what that means

Well it’s something you see often on your tv screens



The places of two images on either side

Of an edit, creating a divide

This means there is an effect caused

That’s a pretty smart term, how bout you give me an applause



I think it’s about time we look at our next term

Connotation, that’s one to learn

The symbolic meaning of every factual detail

Knowing this, a levels are not something you will fail



Let’s look at the main man Roland Barthes
When it comes to effort, he worked the hardest
Born 1915 and died in Paris, France
Now give us a few seconds this is the semiotics dance
Emma's verses
Now that that’s done we can move on
We can research binary opposition 
a pair of related terms or concepts that are opposite
That’s pretty cool, isn’t it

we look at a picture and we denote
but then you have to write some notes
these note are signifiers and connotes
idk what to say so eat some oats

many signifiers leads to an anchor
we needed that or it sank her
signifiers have many possible meanings 
polysemy can be good on screening

there is preferred reading 
negotiated reading
oppositional reading
don’t know what it means, do some reading
Our verses together
Spooky scary narrative enigma 
Gives the character a bad stigma
With intertextuality, everything links
Like episodes of the Simpsons, don't you think?

Narrative enigma gives some mystery
Making people wonder who is he?
The point is that we don't know
Because on screen we don't let it show

We keep it hidden till the very end
And then the connotations are what we send
The symbolic meaning of every factual detail
Connotations even found in Donald Trump's email

Proppian archetypes are a base
I'm about to spill my metaphorical briefcase
Each media text has its archetypes
For example the hero bringing the hype

Equilibrium is where it all starts 
Keeping it chill until it all falls apart 
Todorov is the owner of this theory 
Now we don’t have to query




Friday, 13 September 2019

/// THEORY1 The Auteur Theory

When the director takes all credit for the creation of a movie, ignoring everyone surrounding him including producers, actors, writer and so on. Along with this, he has his own distinct style which breaks away from the normative movies. An example of this would be Quentin Tarantino. He is famous for directing several very famous movies (Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction and so on...)


RICHARD CURTIS - A counter example?
Another interesting example is Richard Curtis, who has won 2 awards including an Emmy in 2006 and a BAFTA in 2007. He has directed films including Love Actually.
 Here is his Filmography...



Richard Curtis may or may not be considered as an auteur. He is heavily successful in the commercial side of film making (makes lots of money when making his movies) but doesn't win awards often. He follows a distinct genre of RomCom (hybrid), although also has his very distinct style, therefore it is tough to decide whether he is an auteur or not. He also ignores the whole social topics including racism, sexism, poverty etc. (follows white, middle class, southern English actors). However, he is known for working with a mainly female centred genre. Just as is the case with others such as soap operas and women's magazines, this is considered "trashy". This issue of sexism is what perhaps prevents him from being an auteur.

SHANE MEADOWS
Shane Meadows is associated with the Indie genre and has directed films slightly less known, for example


Indie film producers are more likely to explore social issues as their audiences are narrower and  are more realistic. this is England explores the issues surrounding racism, which is a serious topic at the moment. It is Shane Meadows own personal story as a child. It is a warp film and had a budget of 1.5 million GBP. The fact that the main character is in poverty shows has he is an auteur and has his own distinct style (social realism style).